Seanan McGuire
Across the Digital Divide
McGuire’s short entry explains the “digital divide” as the
separation of those who can afford e-readers, e-books, and other technology,
and those who can barely afford used books.
She makes a good point that because e-books will never be
sold as “used” for lower prices, this makes them even more impossible for an
impoverished person to obtain. McGuire mentions she is pessimistic, and I have
to agree with her. I don’t think physical books are in any danger of being
replaced by e-books any time remotely soon, in part because of the
aforementioned used book market.
Molly Joss
Examining the
Role of Libraries in an E-book World
Joss points out the
overblown control publishers have over e-books that they do not have with print
books.
I had vague
knowledge before reading this article that HarperCollins had done something
with e-books to annoy libraries, but I wasn’t aware of what. Finding out that
they were limiting loans per e-book so severely got my attention. Since e-books don’t wear out like print books
do, and thus wouldn’t require libraries to purchase replacement titles every so
often, I understand the business logic behind their policy. However, I think a
better and fairer solution would be to license e-books for a certain period of
time, based on how long print books last in circulation.
Glyn Moody
The Koha Saga: A gift that keeps giving
Moody explains the Koha case as an example of open source
technology gone wrong. While this case appears to have been resolved, Moody
cautions other open source projects to secure trademarks early to avoid such a
situation.
I don’t know much about open source software, aside from the
main idea that it is free for anyone to use. I took this article mainly as a
lesson about how quickly businesses can change ownership, and something that
was once free could easily be charged for if proper legal action isn’t taken to
protect that freedom from the beginning.
Sharon Q. Yang and Melissa A. Hofmann
The Next Generation Library Catalog: A comparative Study
of the OPACs of Koha, Evergreen, and Voyager
The authors detail what the ideal Library 2.0 catalog would
include and then rate the integrated library systems Koha, Evergreen, and
Voyager on how well each matches up.
The ideal catalog feature that stood out most to me was
faceted navigation. This is something I almost always see in the public library
catalogs that I use as well as in the Bookmaster software that I use at Barnes
and Noble. This is such a useful feature for narrowing down sources for
research; I’m surprised there are so many academic libraries using Voyager,
which doesn’t have this capability.
Deborah Caldwell-Stone
RFID in Libraries
Caldwell-Stone discusses the use of RFIDs in libraries and
how their use in retail and publishing can compromise the ethical obligations
of librarians to provide privacy for their patrons.
As far as I understand them RFIDs identify a book using
various bibliographic information allowing books to be checked in and out
easily in a library. They can also be used in retail situations, although the
article isn’t very clear on how, security and sales tracking seem to be likely.
To address the needs of both the commercial book industry as well as libraries,
perhaps the data fields on the RFID of a book should be able to be turned off
once that book is owned by a library, using instead the recommended unique
barcode.
I agree with your point on "Digital Divide" article in that e-books do not offer the used book price availability therefore causing further difficulties for people challenged economically. I also feel part of the not in the near future jeopardy for books...is the true love for physical books that many people share. I know myself there are some things I'm fine with obtaining online, but when it comes to reading I want on paper so I can make my notes...and mark reference notes for when I write a paper or post for class assignments. But there are also some types of material I still prefer an actual book. I can see it might be certain types of books that will be the most readily available, with certain types and categories more limited with time due to use and cost.
ReplyDelete