Please
Disable the Entire Filter
This article presents legal arguments
for doing away with mandatory internet filters at libraries, specifically
referencing a case in Arizona. First of all, I really enjoyed this article and
agreed with the author’s conclusions. It seemed that the author had done an
exhaustive amount of research on this subject. It makes a lot of sense for the
library to take more of a “hands off” approach to dealing with problems
concerning the internet. If they implement punitive measures because of the
actions of a single patron, like in Phoenix, then everyone suffers, guilty or
not. If patrons are doing something wrong or illegal, laws and policies already
exist to take care of these patrons. Heavy handed and indiscriminate new
policies should not be formulated that could affect the majority of users who
attend to appropriate internet use. Anten’s recommendations should be taken in
and studied by libraries concerned about this issue.
Public
Access Technologies in Public Libraries
This article discusses the implementation
of Public Access Technologies (PAT) such as computers, printers, and other
hardware and software. The part that I found most interesting (and concerning!)
for public libraries was how patrons envisioned the way these PATs should work.
It seems that some patrons think that library computers are machines that they
should be able to do just about anything on. As a result, many patrons cause
problems while operating them, as the article discusses. This factor could also
lead to decreased use of libraries from patrons, which should lead librarians
to find new ways to connect with patrons. This article also addressed a problem
that I had foreseen, but never really thought about deeply- the rolling treadmill
of technology. The suggestions at the end seemed helpful. Perhaps forming some
sort of partnership with other local government agencies would be an excellent
idea in order to share the burden of technology.
One
Law With Two Outcomes
This article examined the effects of the
implementation of CIPA in public libraries and schools. In general, I found the
conclusions reached by the author to make a great deal of sense. Librarians are
(hopefully!) individuals who take a strong stand on access to information.
Therefore, they would be willing to forgo implementing CIPA and losing the
funds in order to ensure that children and adults have access to a diverse and
high quality set of information from the internet. That said, filters on
computers intended for children may not be a bad idea. Schools seemed to accept
CIPA and get filters because the often funds starved institutions need any
money they can get. For example, an increase in funds means an increase to
access of material for classes, which is always good. Additionally, schools are
places specifically dedicated to education, so filtering out non-educational
material makes sense.
Studying
Indiana Usage of Internet Filters
As the title suggests, this article
discussed the results of a survey of library filter use that the author
undertook. I feel a bit conflicted about this article. On one hand, the surveys
seemed to provide some good information on smaller, conservative communities
and their internet use. At the same time, there was not much discussion of
libraries that are large or understaffed and unable to “patrol” all their
patrons. What about those libraries that have more than “’1 computer and it
sits where both my assistant and I can see it’” (Comer 12)? Perhaps a more
systematic survey is in order for the future.
Sex
in the City
This article discusses the difficulties
that the MPL had in regulating access to obscene material on their computers
and what they eventually chose to do about it. I was very surprised by the lack
of care the Board of Trustees showed towards patron complaints. While standing
up for freedom to access information, we are also bound to listen to our
patrons, especially in a case like this one. As well, judicious and educated
use of the internet by patrons is the dream, but so often times it falls short,
leading to what happened at the MPL.
I like your idea of trying to cut technology costs with partnerships, but I'm not sure partnering up with the local government is a good idea. Especially for smaller communities, local governments aren't always on the cutting edge (more like 10 years behind.) I think its important to think creatively with partnerships. My hometown library has some sort of partnership with the local computer shop. I'm not sure of the exact arrangements but I think its along the lines of all computer equipment is purchased through them and the library gets a percentage off the cost. Plus they donate a laptop every year for the teen summer reading prize.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with you about the Indiana Filters study. A lot of information felt to be lacking and I'm sure by asking just a few more focused questions they would really be on to something with this study.