Across the digital divide by Seanan McGuire
This article discusses the importance of print material,
especially for people living in poverty.
McGuire explains that not everyone can afford new technologies, such as
e-books, and if libraries lose print material, this population will suffer.
It is easy to forget that many people live in poverty and
may not have access to things the rest of us take for granted, such as the
Internet. McGuire, who grew up in poverty, mentioned that she always bought
used books because that was all she could afford. Today, books that are “born digital” will not have used
copies; meaning people without e-book technology won’t be able to read
them. This article made me wonder
what libraries are doing about the digital divide. On the inpublib listserv, the head of adult and teen
services at Kokomo-Howard County Public Library discussed the possibility of
circulating iPads. This forward
thinking is something every library should be doing to help correct the digital
divide.
Examining the Role of Libraries in an E-Book World by
Molly Joss
In this article, Joss discusses the growing demand for
digital media and what effect this has on public libraries. She also discusses the relationship
between publishers, libraries, and e-books.
In my Collection Development class, we discussed the
relationship between librarians, publishers, and jobbers. It was mentioned that publishers want
to make money and librarians want to make their patrons happy. So, to come to an agreement that makes
both happy is very difficult. Joss’
article made this very clear. It
frustrates me that HarperCollins put a limit on the number of times e-books can
be checked out. As a future
librarian, I feel that information should be available for everybody, without
limitations. However, I also
understand that HarperCollins wants to make a profit. Print books wear out eventually and libraries have to buy
them again, so why should they only have to buy digital materials once?
The Next Generation Library Catalog: A Comparative Study
of OPACs of Koha, Evergreen, and Voyager by Sharon Yang and Melissa Hofmann
This article describes a study meant to determine which OPAC
(Koha, Evergreen, or WebVoyage) offers the most features of a next-generation library
catalog.
This article reminded me of Submit or Resist:
Librarianship in the age of Google by
Steven Bell, one of the articles we read for the second week of class. Many features of the next-generation
catalog matched up with the signs of “Googleization” mentioned in Bell’s
article and things we discussed in class that week. Some of these features are the simple keyword search box,
the “Did you mean…?” feature, and the recommendations and related materials
feature. Although Bell seemed to
disagree with these features in his article, Yang and Hofmann discuss the
innovative qualities and the effectiveness of finding and using data with these
features.
Bell, S.J. (2005). Submit or resist: Librarianship in the
age of google. American
Libraries, 36(9), 68-71.
The Koha Saga: A gift that keeps giving by Glyn Moody
This article discusses this history of the open source
library management system, Koha, highlighting the purchase by Liblime and then
PTFS.
What I got out of this article is that copyrights and
trademarks are very important.
Although libraries love sharing and open access, we cannot forget that
not everyone feels the same way.
In order to ensure that open access library management systems continue
to be a thing of the future, copyrights and trademarks are essential.
RFID in Libraries by Deborah Caldwell-Stone
This article discusses RFID in libraries and the potential
privacy concerns it may bring to library patrons.
As soon as this article described what RFID was, I
immediately thought “What about people’s privacy?” It was reassuring when a few
paragraphs later, the article discussed the privacy problem. I found it surprising that
Caldwell-Stone says in the article that RFID was not expected to be
controversial. Any loss of freedom
is always controversial! I have
only encountered RFID in MCPL, and all I knew about it before this article is
that it helps sort books when you return them, so I found this article very
informative.
Even though the article by Molly Joss was brief, I enjoyed because it did allow to understand a bit where some of the friction can be concerning books, e-books and librarians serving patrons. I too was sorry to hear that HarperCollins had been a bit difficult with limitations, but as you outlined...they do have some validity in their justification. This like any business can put so many people in the middle even their counterparts such as we seen with OverDrive. With the protests and ongoing issues the authors associated with these publishers are really in a bad situation especially if they are under contract with the company. As Johnson pointed out...the important value at the end of the day is writing and reading of the material...I just hope they can resolve and not lose sight of why the companies are needed. Hopefully they can lead the path for a fair business practice to printed books and the growing demand for e-books.
ReplyDeleteI'm against libraries circulating ipads and other such technology. It seems to me that the risk would be far more than the benefit. if you loan someone a book and they spill coffee on it, you can dry it out. If you loan someone an ipad and they spill coffee on it...that's a 500 dollar fine. Then you have to set age limits. Can an 8 year old check one out? What about a 5 year old? It seems messy to me. I'd say have them available for in-library use, but then what's the point?
ReplyDelete